COMPARISON OF BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN TURP AND OPEN PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENT WITH BPH
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Objective: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the enlargement of prostate glands. Two commonly used methods of BPH surgery in Indonesia are transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy. International studies have shown both methods have bleeding complications, occurring in 7% in TURP and 22% in open prostatectomy. But, only few researches for bleeding during BPH surgery are done in Indonesia. This study aimed to analyze the difference in bleeding complications between TURP and open prostatectomy in Indonesia. Material & Methods: An observational study with cross-sectional design, using consecutive sampling from medical records of patients above 21 years old with BPH who came to Poli Urologi Soetomo Hospital in 2015–2016 for TURP or open prostatectomy. Data were analyzed using Fischer and Mann-Whitney. Results: Information was obtained from 62 patients, TURP was done in 49 patients (79.03%) and 13 patients (26.53%) in which had bleeding complication. Open prostatectomy was done in 13 patients (20.97%) and 6 patients (46.15%) in which had bleeding complications. Fischer test showed no significant difference in bleeding complications between TURP and open prostatectomy in patients with BPH (p=0.192), including patients with urine retention (p=0.451), without urine retention (p=0.249), age below 70 (p=0.140) and above 70 (p=1). Mann-Whitney test showed significant difference in bleeding complications volume between TURP and open prostatectomy (p=0.012). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in bleeding complications between TURP and open prostatectomy in patients with BPH. But, between TURP and open prostatectomy significant difference in bleeding volume was found.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Benign prostatic hyperplasia, transurethral resection of prostate, open prostatectomy, bleeding complications, cross-sectional
Dhingra N, Bhagwat D. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: An overview of existing treatment. Indian Journal of Pharmacology. 2011; 43(1): 6-12.
NG B, Dasan TA, Patil SS. Correlation of sonographic prostate volume with international prostate symptom score in South Indian men. International Journal of Research in Medical Science. 2015; 3(11): 3126-30.
Haddad D, Krane L, Badlani G, Mirzazadeh M, Winston-Salem. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes in Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Management Using The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The Journal of Urology. 2015; 193(22).
Kiptoon DK. The Immediate Postoperative Outcome of Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy For Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia at Kenyatta National Hospital. Dissertation, Kenya, University of Nairobi; 2004.
Mochtar CA, Umbas R, Soebadi DM, Rasyid N, Noegroho BS, Poernomo BB, et al. Panduan Penatalaksanaan Klinis Pembesaran Prostat Jinak (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia/BPH), Ikatan Ahli Urologi Indonesia (IAUI); 2015.
Carneiro A, Sakuramoto P, Wroclawski M L, Forseto P H, Julio A D, Bautzer C R D, et al. Open suprapubic versus retropubic prostatectomy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia during resident’s learning curve: A randomized controlled trial. International Brazilian of Journal Urology. 2016; 42(2): 284-92.
Alawad AAM, Elamin SM, Younis FH. Correlation between prostate volume and lower urinary tract symptoms in Sudanese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia Correlation between prostate volume and lower urinary tract symptoms in Sudanese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Basic Research Journals. 2015; 4: 121–4.
Simforoosh N, Abdi H, Kashi A H, Zare S, Tabibi A, Danesh A, et al. Open Prostatectomy Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Where Are We Standing in the New Era. Urology Journal. 2010; 7: 262-9.
Teo JS, Lee YM, Ho HSS. An Update on Transurethral Surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Asia Journal of Urology. 2017; 4: 195-8.
Johnson S C, Packiam V T, Golan S, Cohen A J, Nottingham C U, Smith N D. The Effect of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes for Open and Minimally Invasive Prostatectomy. Urology. 2016;100:111-116.
Reese SW. The Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism and Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Following Major Urologic Surgery: A Population-Based Analysis. Thesis, Boston, Boston University; 2013.
Elshal AM, El-Nahas AR, Barakat TS, Elsaadany MM, El-Hefnawy AS. Transvesical open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the era of minimally invasive surgery: Perioperative outcomes of a contemporary series. Arab Journal of Urology. 2011; 11: 362-8.
Loeb S, Catalona WJ. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2007; 25: 494-8.
Braeckman J, Denis L. Management of BPH then 2000 and now 2016 - From BPH to BPO. Asian Journal of Urology. 2017; 4: 138-47.
Tzou KY, Kao WT, Lan CY, Ho CH, Chiang YT, Chen KC. Management of prostate enlargement with acute urinary retention: Diode laser vaporization in combination with bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Urological Science. 2016; 27: 31-34.