DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: A MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Objective: This study was performed to define and investigate the incidence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of delayed graft function (DGF) in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN). Material & methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of donor and recipient from our first 100 cases of laparoscopic LDN in Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Jakarta, from November 2011 to February 2014. The criteria used to define DGF were the requirement for dialysis in postoperative week 1 and/or serum creatinine greater than 2.5 mg/dl at postoperative day 7. Patients who did not match any of these criteria were define as having normal renal allograft function. Results: The overall prevalence of DGF was 14%. Recipients body mass index, cold ischemia time, vascular anastomosis time, and total ischemia time were higher among the delayed graft function group, but no risk factors for DGF were significantly associated after multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The incidence of DGF in our study was in the range of that observed in previous studies. The factors that previously reported and believed as risk factors of DGF in laparoscopic LDN were not significantly associated with the development of DGF in our study.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Delayed graft function, laparoscopic, live donor, nephrectomy
Park HS, Hong YA, Kim HG, Choi SR, Sun IO, Chung BH, et al. Delayed graft function in living-donor renal transplantation: 10-year experience. Transplant Proc. 2012; 44: 43-46.
Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Garg AX, Doshi M, Poggio E, Marcus RJ, et al. Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008; 23: 2995-3003.
Grosso G, Corona D, Mistretta A, Zerbo D, Sinagra N, Giaquinta A, et al. Delayed graft function and long-term outcome in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012; 44: 1879-83.
Derweesh IH, Goldfarb DA, Abreu SC, Goel M, Flechner SM, Modlin C, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2005; 65: 862-6.
Abreu SC, Goldfarb DA, Derweesh I, Thornton, Urbain JL, Mascha E, et al. Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004; 171: 52-57.
Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, Evans D, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg. 1997; 226(4): 483-90.
Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol. 2004; 171(1): 47-51.
Chin EH, Hazzan D, Herron DM, Gaetano JN, Ames SA, Bromberg JS, et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21(4): 521-6.
Cooper M, Kramer A, Nogueira JM, Phelan M. Recipient outcomes of dual and multiple renal arteries following 1000 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies at a single institution. Clin Transplant. 2013; 27: 261-6.
Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999; 14: 2090-3.
Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, Schweitzer E, Willand A, Klassen DK, et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 1999; 67(5): 722-8.
Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, Farney AC, Lim JW, Johnson LB, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation. 1999; 68(4): 497-502.
Gupta N, Raina P, Kumar A. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2005; 1(4): 155-164.
Sharma AK, Tolani SL, Rathi GL, Sharma P, Gupta H, Gupta R. Evaluation of factors causing delayed graft function in live related donor renal transplantation. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010; 21: 242-5.
Kwon OJ, Ha Mk, Kwak JY, Lee HW. The impact of delayed graft function on graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2003; 35(1): 92-93.
Senel FM, Karakayali H, Moray G, Haberal M. Delayed graft function: predictive factors and impact on outcome in living-related kidney transplantations. Ren Fail. 1998; 20: 589-95.
Mange KC, Joffe MM, Feldman HI. Effect of the use or nonuse of long-term dialysis on the subsequent survival of renal transplants from living donors. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(10): 726-31.
Rawlins MC, Hefty TL, Brown SL, Biehl TR. Learning laparoscopic donor nephrectomy safely: a report on 100 cases. Arch Surg. 2002; 137: 534-5.
Simforoosh N, Bassiri A, Ziaee SA, Maghsoodi R, Salim NS, Shafi H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: the first randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc. 2003; 35: 2553-4.
El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhai M, Urban DA. Donor nephrectomy: a comparison of technique and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004; 171: 40-43.
Buell JF, Edye M, Johnson M, Li C, Koffron A, Cho E, et al. Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted. Ann Surg. 2001; 233: 645-51.